• On mySimon: The North Face Mountain Sneakers for Men
June 8, 2009 12:45 PM PDT

MacBook Air gets a lot thinner--in price

by Brooke Crothers
  • Font size
  • Print
  • 28 comments

On Monday, the Apple MacBook Air reached a new price low as a wave of sub-$1,000 ultrathin laptops get set to break onto the market.

MacBook Air prices as updated Monday on Apple's Web site

MacBook Air prices as updated Monday on Apple's Web site

(Credit: Apple)

The ultrathin, trend-setting 13-inch notebook made a steep descent from its rarefied, luxury-laptop pricing altitudes. The top-of-the-line Air with a 128GB solid-state drive fell $700 in price to $1,799 from $2,499 and gained a slightly faster 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo processor. The new prices are now posted on Apple's Web site.

The lower-end version with a 120GB hard disk drive fell to $1,499--the lowest price to date for a new (not refurbished) MacBook Air.

The price cut is happening just as PC makers, including Lenovo, Acer, Asus, and MSI, are debuting new ultrathin laptops at price points decidedly lower than the executive-jewelry genre of ultraportables that dominated the market for years.

Lenovo's 3.5-pound 13.3-inch IdeaPad U350, for example, will start at $649. At the other end of the pricing spectrum, the top-of-the-line, ultrasleek Dell Adamo is still listed at $2,699. The clock may be ticking on these lofty price levels, though.

On Monday, Apple also upgraded its comparably sized 13-inch MacBook to MacBook Pro status. The new 13-inch MacBook Pro has the same unibody design but now includes a seven-hour battery, a FireWire 800 port, an SD card slot, a backlit keyboard, and an improved LED-backlit display with a greater color range.

With Nvidia GeForce 9400M integrated graphics, a 2.26GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, 2GB of memory, and a 160GB hard disk drive, the 13-inch MacBook Pro is priced at $1,199. A model with a 2.53 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB of memory, and a 250GB hard disk drive is priced at $1,499.

Brooke Crothers has been an editor at large at CNET News, an analyst at IDC Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly, among other endeavors, including co-manager of an after-school math-and-reading center. He writes for the CNET Blog Network and is not a current employee of CNET. Disclosure.
Recent posts from Nanotech - The Circuits Blog
Netbook vs. iPhone: A better comparison
Nvidia calls Intel's graphics chip tactics 'aggressive'
$1.25 billion later, can AMD take business from Intel?
AMD: Our claims about Intel have been 'ratified'
AMD talks 'Hemlock' graphics, next ultra-thin laptops
Intel Celeron chip anchors $249 Acer Windows 7 laptop
Nvidia CEO says 'no' to Intel-compatible chip
First iPhone, now Droid. Who needs Windows?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (28 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by MyRightEye June 8, 2009 12:55 PM PDT
The new 13" MacBook Pro is on it's way to me as I type. About time Apple made a truly compelling machine.
Reply to this comment
by kcotham June 8, 2009 3:58 PM PDT
Almost makes me wish I had waited another year and a half to get a new machine. Oh well, maybe next time :-)
by michael_j_x June 8, 2009 4:34 PM PDT
to be honest that 13" Pro is actually the first Mac that I consider good value for money. Heck, I might even buy one.
by davrosthedalek June 11, 2009 6:55 PM PDT
Good choice, way better then the crapbook air.
by Assais June 11, 2009 8:57 PM PDT
yeah you big loser, keep spending $600 for a Apple logo on a PC hardware dressed in metal. Moron. Try looking for genuinely decent brands that charge what they're worth such as Acer
by jscott418 June 8, 2009 12:57 PM PDT
So was Apple really putting the screws to previous Apple Air buyers? I would be a little upset myself.
But I guess Apple finally realized that it had to do something. I do not really hate Apple products, but they do remind me of Bose when it comes to their marketing hype. I used to be a Bose fan until one day I was able to what crappy drivers were in one of their speakers. After that I realized it was more about making a crappy speaker sound good. Apple is a lot like that. I mean I have taken a lot of Mac's apart and the parts are just what you expect to see in any computer. In fact some of the LCD screens I was a bit amazed that they were cheaper quality then I expected. So even though I think Apple makes a good operating system and they design nice looking hardware. I would not pay anymore for them then I would any other brand. Just because their standard warranty is no better and their parts are just parts.
Reply to this comment
by fcz1 June 8, 2009 1:11 PM PDT
As for putting the screws to previous buyers... I wouldn't be pissed if I was a previous buyer. That's the nature of electronics, prices drop as the tech advances. I'm not pissed that I bought an iBook nine years ago because I can now get so much more for so much less.
by kcotham June 8, 2009 1:47 PM PDT
The computer industry is very, very fast moving jscott418. If you waited until something got as best it will get before you bought it, you'd be waiting forever. With every computer I've ever bought, I've had buyer's remorse. Everyone I know, that's honest with themselves has been the same way. It's because no sooner do you buy something, they come out with something better. It's just the way of the world. Whether it be cars, computers, phones, widgets, or whatever, there will always be a better one in the pipe.
by kelmon June 8, 2009 2:05 PM PDT
Rule #1 of Business: Price a product at what people will pay for it.

It really doesn't matter how much a product costs to make, as long as you can sell it for more than that then you should sell it for as much as you can make from it.
by slickuser June 8, 2009 1:16 PM PDT
I wish Apple increased the screen resolutions on new models or offered an upgrade. I hate screens with big fonts!
Reply to this comment
by kcotham June 8, 2009 1:49 PM PDT
For the most part, Apple laptops have as high or higher screen resolutions, especially in the MacBook Pro line. You can change system font size with a free tool called Tinker Tool, I think.
by nickshanks June 10, 2009 8:50 AM PDT
Apple keep supplying low resolution screens because Mac OS X is way behind the curve on resolution independence. Vista has supported this for several years now. Apple have been banging on about it at WWDCs for several years too, but are not putting their words into practice. Snow Leopard does not support it as a user feature, despite apple saying "we want [software developers] to be ready for 2008" (in 2007)
by Renegade Knight June 15, 2009 11:59 AM PDT
Funny thing. I actually like that Apple doesn't offer a lot of variations of the screen. All the sizes between "Magoo" and "Squinty" don't really do much.
by Everlovin G June 8, 2009 1:17 PM PDT
@ jscott418: "So even though I think Apple makes a good operating system and they design nice looking hardware. I would not pay anymore for them then I would any other brand."

Then, you aren't going to be buying a "good operating system" or "nice looking hardware," brother. Doh!

DNFTT
Reply to this comment
by docster87 June 8, 2009 3:26 PM PDT
Why do some people buy Cadillacs when a Buick is still a car? Why do some people buy Hummers rather than Jeeps? Why spend twice as much on a car then need be? Why not everyone go get Kias???
You often get what you pay for and I for one am very glad I paid extra for a Mac computer that has reduced my headaches while increasing my production, abilities, and general happiness.
by gerrrg June 8, 2009 2:09 PM PDT
This places an incredible burden on Dell and their Adamo counterpart.
Reply to this comment
by pithenumber June 9, 2009 10:20 AM PDT
wasn't Adamo an Epic Fail from the start?
by Renegade Knight June 15, 2009 11:53 AM PDT
Hopefully it will push the price down on the X300. My next Hacintosh.
by kelmon June 8, 2009 2:09 PM PDT
Nice to see that Firewire finally put in an appearance again on the old MacBook. Dropping that was crazy and I really feel sorry for those who bought the first generation Unibody MacBooks. Frankly, I'd be interested to see what all those nit-wits who posted comments to say that "Firewire is a Pro feature" are thinking now when they had the audacity to suggest that dropping Firewire from the MacBooks was a good thing.
Reply to this comment
by seven7dust June 8, 2009 2:36 PM PDT
they never suggested it as a good thing
they did it because most people don't really use firewire !
USB has the market cornered !
plus even now you need a adapter for FW 400 devices
by Perry_Clease June 8, 2009 2:59 PM PDT
Yes, it is much better than USB when it comes to video cameras, file transfers and such.
by kcotham June 8, 2009 4:02 PM PDT
FireWire is technically superior to USB. FireWire 400 actually has higher sustained data rates that exceed USB 2.

I look for FireWire interfaces in peripherals and devices. I especially did this when my PowerBook G4 was my main machine. It also had FireWire 800. Apple made a huge mistake in not pushing FireWire harder in the beginning.
by nickshanks June 10, 2009 8:47 AM PDT
Apple should include FireWire 3200 in their machines now. It's been standardised for almost a year and USB 3.0 is almost out.
If they don't have S3200 in their next Pro desktop upgrade I will be very disappointed.
by seven7dust June 8, 2009 2:37 PM PDT
Now the Dell Adamo looks worse tan it already was !
Looks like dell will need to shut one more of it's factories soon !
Reply to this comment
by davrosthedalek June 11, 2009 6:54 PM PDT
Even Apple fanboys think the AIR is a pile of crap. Worthless.
Reply to this comment
by Assais June 11, 2009 9:01 PM PDT
Hmmm..what happened mighty Apple? All of sudden contradicting yourself by lowering your shiny hardware price afraid of...cheap PC competitors eating away your market?

Haha, about time they got a reality check
Reply to this comment
by J.G. June 12, 2009 6:15 AM PDT
A recession happened to Apple and everyone else. The lower prices are not a response to the release of thin netbooks, which do not compete with Apple laptops. Apple seeks to increase market share during this recession by sweetening its deals.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight June 15, 2009 11:57 AM PDT
They are all computers. Thus they are all competitors. You don't have to like it or even believe it, but it's true.

However to help you understand. I'll point out the proof in your post. "Apple seeks to increase market share". That increase share would come from the competition.
(28 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next

A CNET Conversation with Eric Schmidt

CNET's Tom Krazit and Molly Wood sit down with Google CEO Eric Schmidt to discuss the future of Android, the Chrome OS, the problem of real-time search indexing, and more.

Verizon tests sending RIAA copyright notices

The No. 2 phone company, known for its reluctance to intervene in antipiracy cases, strikes an agreement to forward copyright notices on behalf of the music industry.

advertisement

About Nanotech - The Circuits Blog

Brooke Crothers was formerly editor-at-large at CNET News.com, an analyst at IDC (International Data Corp.) Japan, and an editor at The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly (The Wall Street Journal, Dow Jones), among other endeavors, including a recent hiatus from the tech industry when he co-managed an after-school math and reading center. Nanotech covers computer chip technology and how it defines the computing experience. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and is not an employee of CNET. Disclosure.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Nanotech - The Circuits Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right